Role Congruity Theory: Perceptions of Fairness and Sexism in Sport Management

• Published in: Public organization review Vol. 15; no. 4; pp. 475 - 485
• Main Authors: Whisenant, Warren, Lee, Debbiesiu L., Dees, Windy
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.12.2015; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Athletic directors; Attitudes; Coaches & managers; Distributive justice; Economic Policy; Football; Gender; High school sports; Justice; Leadership; Management; Organizational justice; Perceptions; Political Science; Political Science and International Relations; Political Science and International Studies; Prejudice; Procedural justice; Public Administration; Public Finance; Roles; Secondary schools; Sex roles; Sexism; Sports management; Stereotypes; Theory; Women; United States > US; Role congruity theory; Sexism; Fairness; Sport management
• ISSN: 1566-7170; 1573-7098
• DOI: 10.1007/s11115-014-0281-z

This study applied three dimensions of organizational justice - distributive justice, procedural justice, and interpersonal justice – to high school athletics to determine if the fairness perceptions held by head coaches towards their athletic director differed based upon the sex of the athletic director or sex of the coach, after controlling for the level of ambivalent sexism of the coach. If fairness perceptions did differ significantly, the findings would support the notion that attitudes towards women in leadership roles were less positive than attitudes towards men even after controlling for sexist attitudes, thus supporting role congruity theory of prejudice toward women in leadership roles. The results indicated the fairness perceptions held by the coaches differed depending upon the sex of the coach and sex of the athletic director. After controlling for the coaches’ sexist attitudes, male coaches’ perceptions of distributive justice of female athletic directors was significantly lower than female coaches’ perceptions.