Scaffolding analytical argumentative writing in a design class: A corpus analysis of student writing

•Explicit instruction grounded in an SFL-based approach to genre led to improved student writing.•Explicit instruction led to consistent use of specialized, discipline-specific words to frame analyses.•Explicit instruction led to effective integration of external resources to set up an argument. We...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLinguistics and education Vol. 51; pp. 20 - 30
Main Authors Gomez-Laich, Maria Pia, Miller, Ryan T., Pessoa, Silvia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Inc 01.06.2019
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Explicit instruction grounded in an SFL-based approach to genre led to improved student writing.•Explicit instruction led to consistent use of specialized, discipline-specific words to frame analyses.•Explicit instruction led to effective integration of external resources to set up an argument. We report on an interdisciplinary collaboration between writing professors with training in linguistics and a design professor at an English-medium university in the Middle East, where the majority of the students have English as an additional language. We briefly describe the iterative process of redesigning the writing assignments and designing writing workshops to make the design professor's expectations more explicit. We then investigate the impact of the explicit instruction and writing workshops on students’ writing. We use a corpus-based tool to compare the writing of students who participated in the workshops to that of students who took the course in a previous semester, when the workshops were not offered. Our analysis points to an improvement in student writing as a result of the disciplinary writing workshops, particularly in the use of linguistic resources to write analytically.
ISSN:0898-5898
1873-1864
DOI:10.1016/j.linged.2019.03.003