Functional and emotional traits of corporate social media message strategies: Behavioral insights from S&P 500 Facebook data

•Interactivity negatively impacts while vividness positively impacts engagement.•Emotional traits yield stronger engagement outcomes than functional traits.•The joint effects between emotional and functional traits vary by outcomes. Drawing from literature regarding public engagement, the Elaboratio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPublic relations review Vol. 45; no. 1; pp. 88 - 103
Main Authors Ji, Yi Grace, Chen, Zifei Fay, Tao, Weiting, Cathy Li, Zongchao
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Silver Spring Elsevier Inc 01.03.2019
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Interactivity negatively impacts while vividness positively impacts engagement.•Emotional traits yield stronger engagement outcomes than functional traits.•The joint effects between emotional and functional traits vary by outcomes. Drawing from literature regarding public engagement, the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), computer-mediated communication research, and emotion psychology, this study examines the effects of companies’ social media communication strategies on public engagement behaviors as indexed by post likes, shares, and comments. Specifically, it investigates how corporate Facebook posts’ functional traits (functional interactivity and vividness) and emotional traits (emotion presence, valence, and strength) impact public engagement online. Through data mining and computer-assisted sentiment analysis of 33,379 posts from 106 Standard & Poor 500 companies’ Facebook accounts, this study finds a negative effect of functional interactivity but a positive effect of vividness on engagement. It also shows that emotional traits overall yield stronger public engagement outcomes. Two-way interactions between emotional and functional features are also detected. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
ISSN:0363-8111
1873-4537
DOI:10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.12.001