Modeling the Operation of Charge Trap Flash Memory-Part II: Understanding the ISPP Curve With a Semianalytical Model

Flash memory with a charge trap layer (CTL), also known as silicon-oxide-nitride-oxide-silicon (SONOS), is the most common type in production, yet there is a lack of consensus on the physical modeling of its operation. In Part I, we therefore proposed a full TCAD model based on an energy relaxation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on electron devices Vol. 71; no. 1; pp. 554 - 559
Main Authors Verreck, Devin, Schanovsky, Franz, Arreghini, Antonio, Van den Bosch, Geert, Stanojevic, Zlatan, Karner, Markus, Rosmeulen, Maarten
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York IEEE 01.01.2024
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Flash memory with a charge trap layer (CTL), also known as silicon-oxide-nitride-oxide-silicon (SONOS), is the most common type in production, yet there is a lack of consensus on the physical modeling of its operation. In Part I, we therefore proposed a full TCAD model based on an energy relaxation approach and showed that it captures experimentally observed memory operation. This numerical model, however, comes with considerable complexity and computational cost. In Part II, we therefore construct a semianalytical model based on similar physical assumptions, called Pheido, to be as simple as possible. We first derive the model equations based on a balance of current densities, detailing the approximations made. We then use Pheido to analyze the various regimes of an experimental incremental step pulse programming (ISPP) curve and compare it to the full TCAD model derived in Part I. Finally, we investigate the impact of material and structural cell parameters on the ISPP curve, illustrating how the Pheido model offers wide utility at low computational cost.
ISSN:0018-9383
1557-9646
DOI:10.1109/TED.2023.3339112