Operationalising targeted next-generation sequencing for routine diagnosis of drug-resistant TB

BACKGROUND: Phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) for Mycobacterium tuberculosis can take up to 8 weeks, while conventional molecular tests identify a limited set of resistance mutations. Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) offers rapid results for predicting comprehensive drug resist...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPublic health action Vol. 13; no. 2; pp. 43 - 49
Main Authors Iyer, A., Ndlovu, Z., Sharma, J., Mansoor, H., Bharati, M., Kolan, S., Morales, M., Das, M., Issakidis, P., Ferlazzo, G., Hirani, N., Joshi, A., Tipre, P., Sutar, N., England, K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published France International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 21.06.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND: Phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) for Mycobacterium tuberculosis can take up to 8 weeks, while conventional molecular tests identify a limited set of resistance mutations. Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) offers rapid results for predicting comprehensive drug resistance, and this study sought to explore its operational feasibility within a public health laboratory in Mumbai, India.METHODS: Pulmonary samples from consenting patients testing Xpert MTB-positive were tested for drug resistance by conventional methods and using tNGS. Laboratory operational and logistical implementation experiences from study team members are shared below.RESULTS: Of the total number of patients tested, 70% (113/161) had no history of previous TB or treatment; however, 88.2% (n = 142) had rifampicin-resistant/multidrug-resistant TB (RR/MDR-TB). There was a high concordance between resistance predictions of tNGS and pDST for most drugs, with tNGS more accurately identifying resistance overall. tNGS was integrated and adapted into the laboratory workflow; however, batching samples caused significantly longer result turnaround time, fastest at 24 days. Manual DNA extraction caused inefficiencies; thus protocol optimisations were performed. Technical expertise was required for analysis of uncharacterised mutations and interpretation of report templates. tNGS cost per sample was US$230, while for pDST this was US$119.CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of tNGS is feasible in reference laboratories. It can rapidly identify drug resistance and should be considered as a potential alternative to pDST.
Bibliography:2220-8372(20230621)13:2L.43;1-
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2220-8372
2220-8372
DOI:10.5588/pha.22.0041