Disentangling social media influence in crises: Testing a four-factor model of social media influence with large data
•Propose a new framework theorizing g different dimensions of social media influence in crises.•Test the integrative framework with large-scale Twitter data from four crises.•Results from multigroup CFA on Twitter suggest four factors of social media influence.•Each factor is associated with a disti...
Saved in:
Published in | Public relations review Vol. 44; no. 4; pp. 549 - 561 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Silver Spring
Elsevier Inc
01.11.2018
Elsevier Science Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •Propose a new framework theorizing g different dimensions of social media influence in crises.•Test the integrative framework with large-scale Twitter data from four crises.•Results from multigroup CFA on Twitter suggest four factors of social media influence.•Each factor is associated with a distinct set of users’ communicative behaviors.
Social media empower publics by providing a platform for their voices during crises. Digital-enabled platforms allow individuals to become influentials by sharing their insights and expertise with others. Confronted with the fast-paced and complex dynamics of crises, we lack a systematic conceptualization and a valid measure of social media influence in the crisis context. By integrating diverse perspectives on influence, we propose a new framework that theorizes different dimensions of social media influence based on publics’ communicative behaviors during crises. This integrated framework offers a refined conceptualization and measurement of social media influence in crises by incorporating the network perspective. We tested the framework with large-scale Twitter data from four crises. Results from multigroup CFA on Twitter influencers suggest that social media influence is composed of four factors: output, reactive outtake, proactive outtake, and network positioning. Each factor is associated with a distinct set of users’ behavioral indicators (e.g., retweet). Implications for crisis communication and public relations are discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0363-8111 1873-4537 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.08.002 |