Reinforcer value moderates response magnitude and persistence during extinction: A randomized trial

Extinction bursts, or temporary increases in rates and intensities of behavior during extinction, can preclude the inclusion of extinction in intervention packages meant to suppress severe challenging behavior. To identify underlying behavioral mechanisms responsible for response persistence and bur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of applied behavior analysis Vol. 57; no. 3; pp. 615 - 634
Main Authors Lambert, Joseph M., Osina, Maria A., Copeland, Bailey A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.07.2024
Subjects
Adolescent
Adult
adults
behavioral economics
developmental disabilities
Developmental Disabilities - psychology
Developmental Disabilities - rehabilitation
extinction burst
Extinction, Psychological
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Reinforcement, Psychology
translational research
Young Adult
developmental disabilities
extinction burst
behavioral economics
translational research
adults
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Extinction bursts, or temporary increases in rates and intensities of behavior during extinction, can preclude the inclusion of extinction in intervention packages meant to suppress severe challenging behavior. To identify underlying behavioral mechanisms responsible for response persistence and bursting, 69 adults with developmental disabilities completed a low‐stakes translational investigation employing a 2 × 2 factorial, crossed, and randomized matched blocks design, with batched randomization logic. In each of the four test groups, we made distinct antecedent manipulations with two value parameters commonly studied through behavioral economics (i.e., demand intensity, Pmax) and evaluated the extent to which each of these manipulations influenced target responding during extinction. Although we found statistically significant differences attributable to both parameters, variations in reinforcer consumption relative to demand intensity were most influential across all dependent variables. This outcome implicates consumption relative to demand intensity as both a mitigating and exacerbating preextinction factor that influences the prevalence of adverse collateral extinction effects (e.g., bursts).
Bibliography:Handling Editor
Derek Reed
Editor‐in‐Chief
John Borrero
ISSN:0021-8855
1938-3703
DOI:10.1002/jaba.1088