Primary care access to radiology: Characteristics of trauma patients referred to the emergency department

Rationale, Aims and Objectives Low‐urgent Emergency Department (ED) attendances are a known contributing factor to ED crowding. In the Netherlands, general practitioners (GPs) have direct access to radiology facilities during office hours. Patients with radiographically confirmed traumatic injuries...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of evaluation in clinical practice Vol. 29; no. 1; pp. 101 - 107
Main Authors Kusters, Renske W. J., Peters, Nathalie A. L. R., Osch, Frits H. M., Simons, Petra C. G., Hulsbosch, Mark H. H. M., Janzing, Heinrich M. J., Barten, Dennis G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.02.2023
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Rationale, Aims and Objectives Low‐urgent Emergency Department (ED) attendances are a known contributing factor to ED crowding. In the Netherlands, general practitioners (GPs) have direct access to radiology facilities during office hours. Patients with radiographically confirmed traumatic injuries are subsequently referred to the ED. We analysed these ED trauma patients' characteristics, provided treatments and ED discharge diagnoses to identify the possibility of alternative care pathways. Methods Single‐centre retrospective observational study of trauma patients referred to the ED by the radiology department during office hours (January 2017–December 2017). Data were obtained from patient records. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the extracted data. Results A total of 662 patients were included. The median age was 42 years (range: 1–100, interquartile range (IQR): 15–63) and patients presented to the ED with a median delay of 1 day (range: 0–112 days, IQR: 0–5). Most patients were referred for injuries involving the upper extremities (61.5%) and lower extremities (30%). A total of 48 additional diagnoses were made in the ED. The majority of injuries was classified as ‘minor’ (29.5%) or ‘moderate’ (68.3%) on the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). The median length of stay in the ED was 65 min (range: 7–297 min, IQR: 43–102). Conclusion Most patients presented with low acuity injuries and often with a notable delay to the ED. This suggests that the majority of these patients do not necessarily need ED treatment, which may provide an opportunity to counter ED crowding.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1356-1294
1365-2753
DOI:10.1111/jep.13738