Global Value Chains and Intermediaries in Multi‐stakeholder Initiatives in Pakistan and India
ABSTRACT In this article, we analyse the role of regulatory intermediaries of the Better Cotton Initiative, a multi‐stakeholder initiative (MSI) in the global cotton value chain, with a regional focus on India and Pakistan. We conceptualize how the key roles of regulatory intermediaries — translatin...
Saved in:
Published in | Development and change Vol. 52; no. 3; pp. 504 - 532 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.05.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | ABSTRACT
In this article, we analyse the role of regulatory intermediaries of the Better Cotton Initiative, a multi‐stakeholder initiative (MSI) in the global cotton value chain, with a regional focus on India and Pakistan. We conceptualize how the key roles of regulatory intermediaries — translating and verifying compliance with rules in ways that make these rules practical and intelligible for target audiences (in this case, cotton farmers) — may be compromised by global value chain pressures and contradictory MSI requirements, thereby undermining the aim of mainstreaming sustainability standard systems. In other words, we theorize how MSIs can become subject to regulatory capture, serving the needs of global brands (for rapid upscaling, price minimization and verification) and sustainability standard bodies (contradictory demands for capacity building and compliance) at the expense of the intended beneficiaries — farmers at the base of global value chains. Based on an empirical analysis of the Better Cotton Initiative's implementing partners in Pakistan and India, we conclude that such weaknesses in standard implementation are likely to translate into poorer field‐level results in terms of ensuring the large‐scale, global mainstreaming of more sustainable commodity production sought by MSI practitioners. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | We would like to thank the Better Cotton Initiative secretariat in Geneva, WWF‐Pakistan and IKEA Sweden, as well as the journal's anonymous referees, for commenting on an earlier draft of this paper. We are also grateful for the support of the Danish Social Science Research Council for our project titled ‘Multi‐Stakeholder Initiatives in the Cotton Value Chains of South Asia’ (2013–2018), grant number 1327‐00085B. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 0012-155X 1467-7660 |
DOI: | 10.1111/dech.12647 |