Comparison between pea and soy protein‐based bioplastics obtained by injection molding

The elaboration of bioplastics from renewable polymers (e.g., proteins) is a field with great potential for industrial applications such as food packaging and agriculture. This study evaluates the development of bioplastic systems by injection molding using two different raw materials: soy protein i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of applied polymer science Vol. 138; no. 20
Main Authors Jiménez‐Rosado, Mercedes, Rubio‐Valle, Jose Fernando, Perez‐Puyana, Víctor, Guerrero, Antonio, Romero, Alberto
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 20.05.2021
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The elaboration of bioplastics from renewable polymers (e.g., proteins) is a field with great potential for industrial applications such as food packaging and agriculture. This study evaluates the development of bioplastic systems by injection molding using two different raw materials: soy protein isolate (SPI) and pea protein isolate (PPI). Both proteins are by‐products, which lowers the price of processed bioplastics. However, it is necessary to control their properties during the manufacture processing, in order to ensure that they can replace conventional plastics. Therefore, the main objective of this work was to compare the properties of SPI and PPI bioplastics processed at different injection times (150, 300, and 450 s) and different mold temperatures (70 and 130°C). Thus, mechanical properties, water uptake capacity, and transparency were evaluated. The results show the potential of these raw materials to produce bioplastics that can replace conventional plastics, and that the processing conditions can be modified to obtain the desired final properties. This work is focus on the development of soy and pea protein‐based bioplastics using different parameters (injection time and mold temperature) in their processing by injection molding.
Bibliography:Funding information
MEFP, Grant/Award Number: FPU17/01718; MICINN, Grant/Award Number: RTI2018‐097100‐B‐C21
ISSN:0021-8995
1097-4628
DOI:10.1002/app.50412