Tensed Metaphysics and Non-Local Grounding of Truth
It is argued that the assignment of truth values to future contingents is threatened not by a tensed metaphysics but by a temporally “local” notion of truth, , by the assumption that whatever is true at a given time needs to be grounded in what exists at that time. If this assumption is accepted, te...
Saved in:
Published in | Disputatio (Lisbon, Portugal) Vol. 13; no. 63; pp. 411 - 422 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Sciendo
01.12.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | It is argued that the assignment of truth values to future contingents is threatened not by a tensed metaphysics but by a temporally “local” notion of truth,
, by the assumption that whatever is true at a given time needs to be grounded in what exists at that time. If this assumption is accepted, tensed and tenseless metaphysics are equally vulnerable; if it is rejected, both can accommodate true future contingents. This means that semantic decisions are largely independent of metaphysical considerations. The work of Correia and Rosenkranz (2018) is a clear example of how the tensed metaphysics of the growing block can incorporate true future contingents. Two potential worries are discussed in the context of their work: (a) that their grounding strategy overgeneralizes and admits true counterfactual contingents; and (b) that the growing block theory lacks sufficient resources to distinguish the unique possible future course of events that is relevant for the grounding of future contingents. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2182-2875 2182-2875 |
DOI: | 10.2478/disp-2021-0023 |