Quality and efficiency of bystander CPR
Incorrectly performed bystander CPR might compromise survival of the cardiac arrest patient. We therefore evaluated the outcome in 3306 out-of-hospital primary cardiac arrests of which 885 received bystander CPR. bystanders performed CPR correctly in 52%, incorrectly in 11%, 31% performed only exter...
Saved in:
Published in | Resuscitation Vol. 26; no. 1; pp. 47 - 52 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Shannon
Elsevier Ireland Ltd
01.08.1993
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Incorrectly performed bystander CPR might compromise survival of the cardiac arrest patient. We therefore evaluated the outcome in 3306 out-of-hospital primary cardiac arrests of which 885 received bystander CPR. bystanders performed CPR correctly in 52%, incorrectly in 11%, 31% performed only external chest compressions (ECC) and 6% only mouth-to-mouth ventilation (MMV). The initial ECG in cases without bystander CPR was ventricular fibrillation in 28% (95% confidence interval: 27–30%); 45% (41–50%) and 39% (29–48%), respectively when bystander CPR was performed correctly or incorrectly; 43% (37–49%) when only ECC was applied and 22% (11–33%) when only MMV was practiced. Long term survival, defined as being awake 14 days after CPR, was 16% (13–19%) in patients with correct bystander CPR; 10% (7–14%) and 2% (0–9%), respectively when only ECC or only MMV was performed; 7% (6–8%) when no bystander was involved; 4% (0–8%) when bystander CPR was performed incorrectly. Bystander CPR might have a beneficial effect on survival by maintaining the heart in ventricular fibrillation by ECC. A negative effect of badly performed bystander CPR was not observed compared to cases which had not received bystander CPR. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0300-9572 1873-1570 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0300-9572(93)90162-J |