New histories of political violence and revolutionary terrorism in modern South Asia

This book round table discusses two recent monographs on political violence and revolutionary terrorism in late colonial India, Kama Maclean's A Revolutionary History of Interwar India: Violence, Image, Voice and Text (2015) and Durba Ghosh's Gentlemanly Terrorists: Political Violence and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSouth Asian history and culture Vol. 10; no. 3; pp. 340 - 360
Main Authors Amstutz, Andrew, Elam, Daniel, Choudhury, Rishad, Banerjee, Mou, De, Rohit, Silvestri, Michael, Maclean, Kama, Ghosh, Durba
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Routledge 03.07.2019
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Asian history
Bengal
British empire
Democracy
Global trends
Historiography
Independence movements
Legal studies
Nation states
Nonviolence
Political violence
Punjab
Religion
Revolutionaries
Surveillance
Tactics
Terrorism
Terrorists
Violence
India
South Asia
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:This book round table discusses two recent monographs on political violence and revolutionary terrorism in late colonial India, Kama Maclean's A Revolutionary History of Interwar India: Violence, Image, Voice and Text (2015) and Durba Ghosh's Gentlemanly Terrorists: Political Violence and the Colonial State in India, 1919-1947 (2017). Maclean's A Revolutionary History of Interwar India uncovers how revolutionaries in Punjab and northern India reshaped the goals and tactics of the Indian independence movement, especially the policy of nonviolence. Ghosh's Gentlemanly Terrorists explores the relationship of political violence in Bengal to the development of the modern nation-state in India. Both Ghosh and Maclean rethink the conventional narrative of the Indian freedom struggle and connect local developments in South Asia to global trends in anticolonial resistance and to larger conversations about the relationship between democracy and surveillance. In the five review essays, Daniel Elam, Rishad Choudhury, Mou Banerjee, Rohit De, and Michael Silvestri assess the impact of these two monographs on South Asian history, legal studies, histories of religion, studies of anticolonial movements, and British imperial historiography. In their responses, Maclean and Ghosh assess the challenges of writing histories of revolutionaries in the present in relation to the anticipated futures of the revolutionaries themselves.
ISSN:1947-2498
1947-2501
DOI:10.1080/19472498.2019.1649942