Should we keep rocking? Portraits from targeting Rho kinases in cancer

[Display omitted] •The Rho-associated coiled-coil kinases (ROCK1 and ROCK2) gained popularity and progressively been researched as anti-cancer targets.•Their dysregulation has been associated with increased metastasis and poorer patient survival in several tumor types.•In the pediatric setting, the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPharmacological research Vol. 160; p. 105093
Main Authors de Sousa, Graziella Ribeiro, Vieira, Gabriela Maciel, das Chagas, Pablo Ferreira, Pezuk, Julia Alejandra, Brassesco, María Sol
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[Display omitted] •The Rho-associated coiled-coil kinases (ROCK1 and ROCK2) gained popularity and progressively been researched as anti-cancer targets.•Their dysregulation has been associated with increased metastasis and poorer patient survival in several tumor types.•In the pediatric setting, the influence of both isoforms on prognosis remains a controversial issue.•A plethora of pharmacological inhibitors is currently available. Some already approved for the treatment of non-cancer related disorders.•Preclinical testing for cancer treatment has shown alarming features that deserve to be acknowledged for further basic and clinical research. Cancer targeted therapy, either alone or in combination with conventional chemotherapy, could allow the survival of patients with neoplasms currently considered incurable. In recent years, the dysregulation of the Rho-associated coiled-coil kinases (ROCK1 and ROCK2) has been associated with increased metastasis and poorer patient survival in several tumor types, and due to their essential roles in regulating the cytoskeleton, have gained popularity and progressively been researched as targets for the development of novel anti-cancer drugs. Nevertheless, in a pediatric scenario, the influence of both isoforms on prognosis remains a controversial issue. In this review, we summarize the functions of ROCKs, compile their roles in human cancer and their value as prognostic factors in both, adult and pediatric cancer. Moreover, we provide the up-to-date advances on their pharmacological inhibition in pre-clinical models and clinical trials. Alternatively, we highlight and discuss detrimental effects of ROCK inhibition provoked not only by the action on off-targets, but most importantly, by pro-survival effects on cancer stem cells, dormant cells, and circulating tumor cells, along with cell-context or microenvironment-dependent contradictory responses. Together these drawbacks represent a risk for cancer cell dissemination and metastasis after anti-ROCK intervention, a caveat that should concern scientists and clinicians.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1043-6618
1096-1186
DOI:10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105093