A Randomized Trial Investigating the Cost-Utility of Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty in an Obese Population

• Published in: The Journal of arthroplasty Vol. 36; no. 9; pp. 3078 - 3088
• Main Authors: Zomar, Bryn O., Vasarhelyi, Edward M., Somerville, Lyndsay E., Lanting, Brent A., Howard, James L., Marsh, Jacquelyn D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Inc 01.09.2021
• Subjects: cost-effect; cost-utility; obese; patient specific instrumentation; total knee arthroplasty; total knee arthroplasty; cost-utility; patient specific instrumentation; obese; cost-effect
• ISSN: 0883-5403; 1532-8406
• DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.04.029

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with the goal of increased accuracy of component positioning by custom fitting cutting guides to the patient’s bony anatomy. A criticism of this technology is the associated cost. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to determine the cost-utility of PSI compared with standard of care (SOC) instrumentation for TKA in an obese population. Patients with body mass index greater than 30 with osteoarthritis and undergoing primary TKA were randomized to SOC or PSI. Patients completed a health care resource use diary and the EuroQol-5D at three, six, nine, and 12 months and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index at three and 12 months postsurgery. We performed cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses from public health care payer and societal perspectives. One hundred seventy-three patients were included in the analysis with 86 patients randomized to PSI and 87 to SOC. PSI was dominated (more costly and less effective) by SOC from a health care payer perspective. From a societal perspective, an incremental cost-utility ratio was calculated at $11,230.00 per quality-adjusted life year gained, which is cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of $50,000. Net benefit analyses found PSI was not significantly cost-effective at any willingness to pay value from either perspective. Our results suggest that widespread adoption of PSI may not be economically attractive or clinically indicated. Future considerations are to compare long-term clinical outcomes and radiographic alignment between the groups.