Buttigieg's Method

• Published in: Italian culture Vol. 40; no. 1; pp. 6 - 15
• Main Author: Forgacs, David
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Abingdon Routledge 06.07.2022; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: "law of correlation; Antonio Gramsci; Buttigieg, Joseph J; Editors; Gramsci, Antonio (1891-1937); interpretation; Joseph Buttigieg; legacy; Literary criticism; method; Prior knowledge; Prisons; reading; Sociology; Unfinished works; writing
• ISSN: 0161-4622; 1559-0909
• DOI: 10.1080/01614622.2022.2057020

Joseph Buttigieg's introduction to his uncompleted edition of the Prison Notebooks is one of the best things ever written about Gramsci's prison writings. The last section reproduces, with minimal changes, Buttigieg's 1990 article "Gramsci's Method," and it has the same title. That title, however, is misleading, since what Buttigieg reconstructs is not so much Gramsci's method of writing the notebooks as his own process, as editor, of reading them, which is far from being a factual report of how Gramsci "actually wrote." It involves, instead, a set of interpretive hunches, which in turn presuppose a prior knowledge of all of Gramsci's texts, without which it would not be possible to make the connections he makes between different topics or to rank them, to identify some - such as the critique of positivist sociology and the idea of the philosophy of praxis - as more important, more overarching than others. Symptomatic here is Buttigieg's use of an apparently insignificant note, of just twenty words, "L'ossicino di Cuvier," generally overlooked by Gramsci scholars, as a point of entry into a set of interconnected notes and from there to the whole intellectual edifice of the Prison Notebooks.