Realizing the price of academic freedom

• Published in: American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology Vol. 326; no. 1; pp. H25 - H31
• Main Authors: Chalise, Upendra, King, D Ryan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Physiological Society 01.01.2024
• Subjects: Academic freedom; Careers; Employment; Humans; Recruitment; Research Personnel - education; Retention; Science policy; Training; United States; Workforce; Working Conditions; United States; academic freedom; science policy; recruitment and retention; postdoc
• ISSN: 0363-6135; 1522-1539
• DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00480.2023

Since 2010, the number of life science doctoral graduates opting into academic postdoctoral employment has steadily declined. In recent years, this decline has made routine headlines in academic news cycles, and faculty members, universities, and funding bodies alike have begun to take notice. In November 2022, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) convened a special interest group to address the problems in postdoctoral recruitment and retention. In response, the American Physiological Society Science Policy Committee highlighted several key issues in postdoctoral training and working conditions and offered the NIH solutions to consider. There are known issues that affect postdoctoral recruitment and retention efforts: low wages relative to other employment sectors, a heavy workload, and poor job prospects to name a few. Unfortunately, these concerns are frequently dismissed as "the price of doing business in academia," and postdoctoral scholars are promised that if they overcome the trials and tribulations of this training period, the reward at the end, a career with academic freedom to pursue your own interests, justifies the means. However, academic freedom cannot and should not be used as the band-aid in a system where most of us will never actually experience academic freedom. Instead, we should systematically embrace solutions that improve the personal and professional health of early career researchers in all levels of training and independence if the goal is to truly shore up the academic workforce.