Bio-Protection as an Alternative to Sulphites: Impact on Chemical and Microbial Characteristics of Red Wines

In wine, one method of limiting the addition of sulphites, a harmful and allergenic agent, is bio-protection. This practice consists of the early addition of microorganisms on grape must before fermentation. Non-Saccharomyces yeasts have been proposed as an interesting alternative to sulphite additi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in microbiology Vol. 11; p. 1308
Main Authors Simonin, Scott, Roullier-Gall, Chloé, Ballester, Jordi, Schmitt-Kopplin, Philippe, Quintanilla-Casas, Beatriz, Vichi, Stefania, Peyron, Dominique, Alexandre, Hervé, Tourdot-Maréchal, Raphaëlle
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media 16.06.2020
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In wine, one method of limiting the addition of sulphites, a harmful and allergenic agent, is bio-protection. This practice consists of the early addition of microorganisms on grape must before fermentation. Non-Saccharomyces yeasts have been proposed as an interesting alternative to sulphite addition. However, scientific data proving the effectiveness of bio-protection remains sparse. This study provides the first analysis of the chemical and microbiological effects of a Metschnikowia pulcherrima strain inoculated at the beginning of the red winemaking process in three wineries as an alternative to sulphiting. Like sulphiting, bio-protection effectively limited the growth of spoilage microbiota and had no influence on the phenolic compounds protecting musts and wine from oxidation. The bio-protection had no effect on the volatile compounds and the sensory differences were dependent on the experimental sites. However, a non-targeted metabolomic analysis by FTICR-MS highlighted a bio-protection signature.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1664-302X
1664-302X
DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2020.01308