Stereopsis testing to reduce overreferral in preschool vision screening

Three- and 4-year-old children who obtain the minimum failing visual acuity result of one-line difference between eyes in preschool vision screening with isolated optotypes have a high rate of overreferral. We evaluated the Random Dot E Stereotest (RDES) to determine if a passing result at a high th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus Vol. 28; no. 3; pp. 131 - 133
Main Authors Ruttum, M S, Nelson, D B
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States SLACK INCORPORATED 01.05.1991
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Three- and 4-year-old children who obtain the minimum failing visual acuity result of one-line difference between eyes in preschool vision screening with isolated optotypes have a high rate of overreferral. We evaluated the Random Dot E Stereotest (RDES) to determine if a passing result at a high threshold on this test, as administered by lay screeners, could safely nullify referral for a minimum failing visual acuity test result. Fifty-eight children with a "one-line difference" result also had the RDES administered to them during screening at distances of 40 cm and 1.5 m. Upon subsequent ophthalmologic examination, 45 of these children were found to be normal, and 13 had abnormal findings. Thirty-nine of the children with normal examinations had correctly passed the RDES at 1.5 m. Seven of the 13 children with abnormal findings had correctly failed the RDES. Thus, the specificity of stereotesting was 87% and the sensitivity was 54%. Among the six children who falsely passed the stereopsis test during screening, best-corrected visual acuity was no worse than 20/40 and no child had greater than a one-line difference in acuity. Therefore, no amblyopia was missed. If a passing result on the stereotest at 1.5 m had been allowed to nullify a one-line difference referral, overreferral would have decreased 87% but underreferral would have increased 46%. We cannot yet recommend modifying current visual acuity referral criteria based on stereopsis testing results until the sensitivity of stereopsis screening by lay screeners at a sufficient threshold is improved.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0191-3913
1938-2405
DOI:10.3928/0191-3913-19910501-04