Sensitivity of neurons in the auditory midbrain of the grassfrog to temporal characteristics of sound. I. Stimulation with acoustic clicks

The coding of fine-temporal structure of sound, especially pulse repetition rate, was investigated on the single-unit level in the auditory midbrain of the grassfrog. As stimuli periodic click trains and Poisson distributed click ensembles have been used. The response to periodic click trains was st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHearing research Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 37 - 54
Main Authors Epping, Willem J.M., Eggermont, Jos J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 1986
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The coding of fine-temporal structure of sound, especially pulse repetition rate, was investigated on the single-unit level in the auditory midbrain of the grassfrog. As stimuli periodic click trains and Poisson distributed click ensembles have been used. The response to periodic click trains was studied in two aspects, focussing on two types of possible codes: a rate code and a synchrony code. From the iso-intensity rate histogram five basic average response rate characteristics as function of pulse repetition rate have been established: low-pass, band-pass, high-pass, bimodal and non-selective unit types. The synchronization capability, expressed in a synchronization index, was for a small majority of units non-significant and a low-pass function of pulse repetition rate for most of the other units. The rate code showed the largest diversity of response types and an enhanced selectivity to pulse repetition rate. The stimulus-response relation to Poisson distributed click ensembles was investigated by a non-linear system theoretical approach. On the basis of first- and second-order Poisson kernels possible neural mechanisms accounting for temporal selectivity were determined. A considerable fraction of units exhibited response characteristics that were invariant to changes in sound pressure level and average click rate. These units may function as feature detectors of fine-temporal structure of sound. The spectro-temporal sensitivity range of the auditory midbrain of the grassfrog appeared to be broad and not particularly tuned to the ensemble of conspecific cells.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0378-5955
1878-5891
DOI:10.1016/0378-5955(86)90004-3