Sensitivity of neurons in the auditory midbrain of the grassfrog to temporal characteristics of sound. II. Stimulation with amplitude modulated sound

The coding of fine-temporal structure of sound, especially of frequency of amplitude modulation, was investigated on the single-unit level in the auditory midbrain of the grassfrog. As stimuli sinusoidally amplitude modulated sound bursts and continuous sound with low-pass Gaussian noise amplitude m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHearing research Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 55 - 72
Main Authors Epping, Willem J.M., Eggermont, Jos J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 1986
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The coding of fine-temporal structure of sound, especially of frequency of amplitude modulation, was investigated on the single-unit level in the auditory midbrain of the grassfrog. As stimuli sinusoidally amplitude modulated sound bursts and continuous sound with low-pass Gaussian noise amplitude modulation have been used. Both tonal and wideband noise carriers have been applied. The response to sinusoidally amplitude modulated sound bursts was studied in two aspects focussing on two types of possible codes: a rate code and a synchrony code. From the iso-intensity rate histogram five basic average response characteristics as function of modulation frequency have been observed: low-pass, band-pass, high-pass, bimodal and non-selective types. The synchronization capability, expressed in a synchronization index, was non-significant for 38% of the units and a low-pass function of modulation frequency for most of the other units. The stimulus-response relation to noise amplitude modulated sound was investigated by a non-linear system theoretical approach. On the basis of first- and second-order Wiener-Volterra kernels possible neural mechanisms accounting for temporal selectivity were obtained. About one quarter of the units had response characteristics that were invariant to changes in sound pressure level and spectral content of the carrier. These units may function as feature detectors of fine-temporal structure of sound. The spectro-temporal sensitivity range of the auditory midbrain of the grassfrog appeared not to be restricted to and showed no preference for the spectro-temporal characteristics of the ensemble of conspecific calls. Comparison of response characteristics to periodic click trains as studied in the companion paper (Epping and Eggermont, 1986) and sinusoidally amplitude modulated sound bursts revealed that the observed temporal sensitivity is due to a combination of sensitivities to sound periodicity and pulse duration. It was found that for most units the first-order kernels for Gaussian amplitude modulated stimuli and Poisson distributed click stimuli were alike. In contrast second-order kernels for the Gaussian amplitude modulated stimuli often represented only static non-linearities, while second-order kernels for Poisson distributed clicks (Epping and Eggermont, 1986) mostly revealed dynamic non-linearities.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0378-5955
1878-5891
DOI:10.1016/0378-5955(86)90005-5