Effects from Time Dependence of Ice Nucleus Activity for Contrasting Cloud Types

• Published in: Journal of the atmospheric sciences Vol. 80; no. 8; pp. 2013 - 2039
• Main Authors: Waman, Deepak, Deshmukh, Akash, Jadav, Arti, Patade, Sachin, Gautam, Martanda, Phillips, Vaughan, Bansemer, Aaron, Jakobsson, Jonas
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Meteorological Society 01.08.2023
• Subjects: Clouds; Earth and Related Environmental Sciences; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap; Ice crystals; Ice particles; layer clouds; Meteorologi och atmosfärforskning; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences; Natural Sciences; Naturvetenskap; numerical cloud model; orographic clouds; primary ice; secondary ice; Secondary ice production; thunderstorm; Time dependence
• ISSN: 0022-4928; 1520-0469; 1520-0469
• DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-22-0187.1

Abstract The role of time-dependent freezing of ice nucleating particles (INPs) is evaluated with the “Aerosol–Cloud” (AC) model in 1) deep convection observed over Oklahoma during the Midlatitude Continental Convective Cloud Experiment (MC3E), 2) orographic clouds observed over North California during the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Cloud Aerosol Precipitation Experiment (ACAPEX), and 3) supercooled, stratiform clouds over the United Kingdom, observed during the Aerosol Properties, Processes And Influences on the Earth’s climate (APPRAISE) campaign. AC uses the dynamical core of the WRF Model and has hybrid bin–bulk microphysics and a 3D mesoscale domain. AC is validated against coincident aircraft, ground-based, and satellite observations for all three cases. Filtered concentrations of ice (>0.1–0.2 mm) agree with those observed at all sampled levels. AC predicts the INP activity of various types of aerosol particles with an empirical parameterization (EP), which follows a singular approach (no time dependence). Here, the EP is modified to represent time-dependent INP activity by a purely empirical approach, using our published laboratory observations of time-dependent INP activity. In all simulated clouds, the inclusion of time dependence increases the predicted INP activity of mineral dust particles by 0.5–1 order of magnitude. However, there is little impact on the cloud glaciation because the total ice is mostly (80%–90%) from secondary ice production (SIP) at levels warmer than about −36°C. The Hallett–Mossop process and fragmentation in ice–ice collisions together initiate about 70% of the total ice, whereas fragmentation during both raindrop freezing and sublimation contributes <10%. Overall, total ice concentrations and SIP are unaffected by time-dependent INP activity. In the simulated APPRAISE case, the main causes of persistence of long-lived clouds and precipitation are predicted to be SIP in weak embedded convection and reactivation following recirculation of dust particles in supercooled layer cloud.