Can Precipitation and Temperature from Meteorological Reanalyses Be Used for Hydrological Modeling?

• Published in: Journal of hydrometeorology Vol. 17; no. 7; pp. 1929 - 1950
• Main Authors: Essou, Gilles R. C., Sabarly, Florent, Lucas-Picher, Philippe, Brissette, François, Poulin, Annie
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Boston American Meteorological Society 01.07.2016
• Subjects: Atmospheric forcing; Atmospheric models; Climate models; Climatic zones; Computer simulation; Construction; Datasets; Engineering; Humidity; Hydrologic models; Hydrology; Modelling; Parameter estimation; Precipitation; Precipitation-temperature relationships; Rain; Regions; Remote sensing; River flow; Rivers; Seasonal variations; Seasonality; Studies; Subtropical climates; Temperature; Temperature effects; Watersheds; Weather stations; Canada
• ISSN: 1525-755X; 1525-7541
• DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0138.1

This paper investigates the potential of reanalyses as proxies of observed surface precipitation and temperature to force hydrological models. Three global atmospheric reanalyses (ERA-Interim, CFSR, and MERRA), one regional reanalysis (NARR), and one global meteorological forcing dataset obtained by bias-correcting ERA-Interim [Water and Global Change (WATCH) Forcing Data ERA-Interim (WFDEI)] were compared to one gridded observation database over the contiguous United States. Results showed that all temperature datasets were similar to the gridded observation over most of the United States. On the other hand, precipitation from all three global reanalyses was biased, especially in summer and winter in the southeastern United States. The regional reanalysis precipitation was closer to observations since it indirectly assimilates surface precipitation. The WFDEI dataset was generally less biased than the reanalysis datasets. All datasets were then used to force a global conceptual hydrological model on 370 watersheds of the Model Parameter Estimation Experiment (MOPEX) database. River flows were computed for each watershed, and results showed that the flows simulated using NARR and gridded observations forcings were very similar to the observed flows. The simulated flows forced by the global reanalysis datasets were also similar to the observations, except in the humid continental and subtropical climatic regions, where precipitation seasonality biases degraded river flow simulations. The WFDEI dataset led to better river flows than reanalysis in the humid continental and subtropical climatic regions but was no better than reanalysis—and sometimes worse—in other climatic zones. Overall, the results indicate that global reanalyses have good potential to be used as proxies to observations to force hydrological models, especially in regions with few weather stations.