Quantitative surface free energy with micro-colloid probe pairs

Measurement of the surface free energy (SFE) of a material allows the prediction of its adhesion properties. Materials can have microscale or sub-microscale surface inhomogeneities, engineered or random, which affect the surface macroscopic behaviour. However, quantitative characterization of the SF...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRSC advances Vol. 13; no. 4; pp. 2718 - 2726
Main Authors Haq, Ehtsham-Ul, Zhang, Yongliang, O'Dowd, Noel, Liu, Ning, Leesment, Stanislav, Becker, Claude, Rossi, Edoardo M, Sebastiani, Marco, Tofail, Syed A. M, Silien, Christophe
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Royal Society of Chemistry 11.01.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Measurement of the surface free energy (SFE) of a material allows the prediction of its adhesion properties. Materials can have microscale or sub-microscale surface inhomogeneities, engineered or random, which affect the surface macroscopic behaviour. However, quantitative characterization of the SFE at such length scales remains challenging in view of the variety of instruments and techniques available, the poor knowledge of critical variables and parameters during measurements and the need for appropriate contact models to derive the SFE from the measurements. Failure to characterize adhesion correctly may result in defective components or lengthy process optimization costing billions to industry. Conversely, for planar and homogeneous surfaces, contact angle (CA) measurements are standardized and allow for calculating the SFE using for example the Owen-Wendt model, relying only on the properties of the probing liquids. As such, we assessed and report here a method to correlate quantitative measurements of force-distance curves made with an atomic force microscope (AFM) and with silica and polystyrene (PS) colloidal probe pairs, with quantitative CA measurements and CA-derived SFE values. We measured five surfaces (mica, highly oriented pyrolytic graphite, thermally grown silica on silicon, silicon, and silicon with a super-hydrophobic coating), ranging from hydrophilic to super-hydrophobic, and found an excellent classification of the AFM measurements when these are represented by a set of principal components (PCs), and when both silica and PS colloidal probes are considered together. A regression of the PCs onto the CA measurements allows recovery of the SFE at the length scale of the colloidal probes, which is here ca. 1 micron. We found that once the PC-regression model is built, test sets of only ten AFM force-distance curves are sufficient to predict the local SFE with the calibrated silica and PS colloidal probes. Measurement of the surface free energy (SFE) of a material allows the prediction of its adhesion properties.
Bibliography:polar
D
F
Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Table S1 contains the recorded contact angle wetting measurements on the five test surfaces, using three solvents. Total
squared analysis of the performance of the PCs and regression models. Fig. S4 shows PC2
(
PC1 maps including ITO data. Fig. S5 shows
P
vs.
pull
components of the SFE calculated using Owen-Wendt approach. Fig. S2 shows the second-order regression of
R
https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ra05508b
curves recorded on the mica reference with different probe velocities. See DOI
T
and dispersive
on the CA-derived SFE values for the testing set with silica colloidal probe, PS colloidal probe, and PS and silica probes combined (regression coefficients computed on the training set). Fig. S3 shows a
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2046-2069
2046-2069
DOI:10.1039/d2ra05508b