Quantifying growth in maricultured corals using photogrammetry

• Published in: Aquaculture research Vol. 49; no. 6; pp. 2249 - 2255
• Main Authors: Kikuzawa, Yuichi Preslie, Toh, Tai Chong, Ng, Chin Soon Lionel, Sam, Shu Qin, Taira, Daisuke, Afiq‐Rosli, Lutfi, Chou, Loke Ming
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Hindawi Limited 01.06.2018
• Subjects: Aquaculture; Aquatic crustaceans; Area; Calcification; Comparative analysis; Comparative studies; coral growth; coral mariculture; coral morphology; Corals; Echinopora lamellosa; geometric formula; Growth rate; Literature reviews; Marine aquaculture; Measurement; Measurement methods; Monitoring; Nursery grounds; Photogrammetry; planar area; Polyps; Polyps (organisms)
• ISSN: 1355-557X; 1365-2109
• DOI: 10.1111/are.13683

In coral mariculture, growth is one of the most common ways to track success. However, numerous methods of monitoring coral growth make comparative studies challenging. A literature review of 39 studies from 1982 to 2017 indicated that the most predominant non‐invasive methods used were linear and areal measurement and these were evaluated for their accuracy using nursery‐reared corals. The monthly change in linear and areal growth rates of six coral species (n = 215), Pocillopora acuta, Hydnophora rigida, Merulina ampliata, Podabacia crustacea, Echinopora lamellosa and Platygyra sinensis were measured via photogrammetry. We tested whether the planar area of coral colonies can be estimated using three geometric formulas of linear measurements. Based on the literature review, the six types of measurement methods were namely linear, volume, weight, area, count of polyps/branches and calcification, in decreasing order of application. Our results showed that the change in area calculated by geometric mean diameter (GMD) formulas provided the most accurate estimation among the three formulas and was strongly correlated with planar area (R2 ≥ .60; p < .05) for all coral species, except E. lamellosa and Pl. sinensis. However, our findings suggest that it is not ideal to use geometric formulas to estimate the change in area. Instead, we posit that areal photogrammetry represents the simplest yet accurate non‐invasive method for rapid monitoring of extensive areas of corals in situ. Lastly, we discuss the recommendations and limitations for areal photogrammetry.