A systematic literature review on long‐term localization and mapping for mobile robots

Long‐term operation of robots creates new challenges to Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) algorithms. Long‐term SLAM algorithms should adapt to recent changes while preserving older states, when dealing with appearance variations (lighting, daytime, weather, or seasonal) or environment re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of field robotics Vol. 40; no. 5; pp. 1245 - 1322
Main Authors Sousa, Ricardo B., Sobreira, Héber M., Moreira, António Paulo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.08.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Long‐term operation of robots creates new challenges to Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) algorithms. Long‐term SLAM algorithms should adapt to recent changes while preserving older states, when dealing with appearance variations (lighting, daytime, weather, or seasonal) or environment reconfiguration. When also operating robots for long periods and trajectory lengths, the map should readjust to environment changes but not grow indefinitely. The map size should depend only on updating the map with new information of interest, not on the operation time or trajectory length. Although several studies in the literature review SLAM algorithms, none of the studies focus on the challenges associated to lifelong SLAM. Thus, this paper presents a systematic literature review on long‐term localization and mapping following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analysis guidelines. The review analyzes 142 works covering appearance invariance, modeling the environment dynamics, map size management, multisession, and computational topics such as parallel computing and timing efficiency. The analysis also focus on the experimental data and evaluation metrics commonly used to assess long‐term autonomy. Moreover, an overview over the bibliographic data of the 142 records provides analysis in terms of keywords and authorship co‐occurrence to identify the terms more used in long‐term SLAM and research networks between authors, respectively. Future studies can update this paper thanks to the systematic methodology presented in the review and the public GitHub repository with all the documentation and scripts used during the review process.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1556-4959
1556-4967
DOI:10.1002/rob.22170