Recovery of vegetation on former alpine roads: how long does it take?
Alpine areas worldwide are under heavy land‐use pressure and degradation. Active restoration treatments can contribute to accelerating recovery of degraded areas. However, monitoring data are needed to understand the contribution of restoration treatments to long‐term management and to predict time...
Saved in:
Published in | Nordic journal of botany Vol. 2024; no. 4 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.04.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Alpine areas worldwide are under heavy land‐use pressure and degradation. Active restoration treatments can contribute to accelerating recovery of degraded areas. However, monitoring data are needed to understand the contribution of restoration treatments to long‐term management and to predict time to recovery (TR). In this study, we used monitoring data on removed roads in an alpine area in Norway to investigate TR of three vegetation‐based indicators. Four restoration treatments were tested: 1) removal of added gravel down to original terrain surface, and stirring of topsoil; 2) adding fertilizer to the stirred topsoil; 3) adding seeds to the fertilized topsoil; and 4) no removal of added gravel, but stirring of top layer (gravel and soil). The restoration of roads took place in 2002, and monitoring of permanent plots was carried out in 2004, 2009, 2014, and 2019. Reference plots in intact vegetation next to removed roads were monitored in 2014 and 2019. We used species composition and species richness of vascular plants as well as total vegetation cover as indicators of restoration outcome and investigated predicted TR for these indicators under different restoration treatments. Species composition changed significantly with time since restoration in all treatments, approaching that of the reference vegetation. The recovery of species composition was slowest in fertilized and seeded plots, where estimated TR was 2–3 times longer (> 45 years) than in the other treatments (< 20 years). Species richness of vascular plants was restored quickly (< 5 years) within all restoration treatments, whereas recovery of vegetation cover varied more (20–30 years). Our study confirms that vegetation recovery in alpine environments is a long‐term process, but that adding seeds and nutrients is unnecessary for, and even inhibits, the recovery of narrow, disturbed sites such as former roads. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | This article is a contribution to the Special Issue “Plant‐ and vegetation‐based indicators for restoration in a European context. The article investigates vegetation recovery on restored roads in an alpine site, using multiple vegetation‐based indicators to explore predicted time to recovery under different restoration treatments. This Nordic Journal of Botany Special Issue includes research covering the development and use of plant‐ and vegetation‐based indicators in ecosystem restoration. Ecological restoration is high on the global agenda, with 2021–2030 declared by UN as the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, and with the Kunming−Montral global biodiversity framework target of at least 30% of degraded areas in all ecosystems to be under effective restoration by 2030 (UN 2022). A key to knowledge building in ecological restoration is monitoring. With the upcoming Special Issue, we aim to contribute to the development of science‐based restoration indicators across terrestrial ecosystems in Europe. |
ISSN: | 0107-055X 1756-1051 |
DOI: | 10.1111/njb.03984 |