A decision framework for the management of established biological invasions

• Published in: Facets (Ottawa) Vol. 8; pp. 1 - 10
• Main Authors: Robichaud, C.D., Rooney, R.C., Larson, B.M.H., Wolfe, S.E., Nyssa, Z., Kowalski, K. P., Braun, H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Canadian Science Publishing 01.01.2023
• Subjects: decision framework; invasive species; management; systems thinking
• ISSN: 2371-1671; 2371-1671
• DOI: 10.1139/facets-2022-0200

In some cases, managing an established invasive species may do more harm to an ecosystem than allowing the invader to persist. Given limited resources available to land managers and the realities of conservation triage, we recognized the need for systematic guidance for management decisions made at the “late end” of the invasion curve. We gathered an interdisciplinary group of experts and practitioners to address the question of “under what circumstances is the active management of an established aquatic invasive species warranted?” Our working group identified three key dimensions to this question: (1) the efficacy of available management options; (2) the net benefits of management actions weighed against the null scenario of no control; and (3) the socio-ecological context that defines management goals, a manager’s ability to achieve said goals, and perceptions of management outcomes. These considerations were used to structure a consensus decision tree that supports a multi-criteria approach to decision-making. Our approach promotes interdisciplinarity and systems thinking and emphasizes the need to consider costs and benefits comprehensively, for example by considering the persistence or reversibility of impacts from both the invasive species and from efforts to suppress or eradicate it.