Optical oscillator strengths, mean excitation energy, shell corrections and experimental values for stopping power

• Published in: Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section B, Beam interactions with materials and atoms Vol. 267; no. 15; pp. 2471 - 2474
• Main Authors: Paul, Helmut, Grande, Pedro L., Smith, D.Y.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.08.2009
• Subjects: Energy loss of ions; Mean excitation energy; Optical oscillator strengths; Shell corrections; Stopping power; Shell corrections; Stopping power; Optical oscillator strengths; 34.50.Bw; Energy loss of ions; Mean excitation energy
• ISSN: 0168-583X; 1872-9584
• DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2009.06.009

In a recent paper, Smith, Inokuti, Karstens and Shiles discussed optical oscillator strengths (OOS) of graphite, Al and Si and compared the mean excitation energy I obtained by integration to that from stopping power measurements. They found agreement for graphite and Al, but disagreement for Si. In this paper, we discuss the OOS of Al, Si, Cu and Au and compare the stopping powers calculated from these OOS (or from a single I-value), using program CasP40, directly to experimental stopping power values for protons between 10 and 80 MeV. We find that the choice of proper shell corrections is essential: since the shell correction built into CasP is too small, we take the correction for Al, Si and Cu from the BEST program of Berger and Bichsel. For Au, better results are obtained using Bonderup’s shell correction. With these choices, we find fair agreement between experimental and calculated stopping data, both with the I-values from ICRU Report 49 and with OOS. Even in the case of Si, the stopping curve based on OOS is not in conflict with experimental data. In all cases, the curves calculated using SRIM are in good agreement with the data.