Meshfree generalized finite difference methods in soil mechanics—part I: theory

In soil mechanics, laboratory tests are typically used to classify soils or to test new material laws such as the barodesy model. The results of these tests provide the theoretical basis for subsequent simulations and analysis in geotechnical engineering (e.g., cuts, embankments, foundations). Simul...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGEM international journal on geomathematics Vol. 4; no. 2; pp. 167 - 184
Main Authors Ostermann, I., Kuhnert, J., Kolymbas, D., Chen, C.-H., Polymerou, I., Šmilauer, V., Vrettos, C., Chen, D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.11.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In soil mechanics, laboratory tests are typically used to classify soils or to test new material laws such as the barodesy model. The results of these tests provide the theoretical basis for subsequent simulations and analysis in geotechnical engineering (e.g., cuts, embankments, foundations). Simulation tools which are reliable as well as economical concerning the computing time are indispensable for applications. In this contribution we introduce two novel meshfree generalized finite difference methods—Finite Pointset Method and Soft PARticle Code—to simulate the standard benchmark problems “oedometric test” and “triaxial test”. One of the most important ingredients of both meshfree approaches is the weighted moving least squares method used to approximate the required spatial partial derivatives of arbitrary order on a finite pointset.
ISSN:1869-2672
1869-2680
DOI:10.1007/s13137-013-0048-7