Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal to Avoid Invasive Ventilation During Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: VENT-AVOID Trial – A Randomized Clinical Trial

It is unclear whether extracorporeal CO removal (ECCO R) can reduce the rate of intubation or the total time on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in adults experiencing an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). To determine whether ECCO R increases the number of ventilator...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine Vol. 209; no. 5; pp. 529 - 542
Main Authors Duggal, Abhijit, Conrad, Steven A., Barrett, Nicholas A., Saad, Mohamed, Cheema, Tariq, Pannu, Sonal, Romero, Ramiro Saavedra, Brochard, Laurent, Nava, Stefano, Ranieri, V. Marco, May, Alexandra, Brodie, Daniel, Hill, Nicholas S., Dumont, Tiffany, Krishnan, Sudhir, Exline, Matthew, Paz, Francisco, Huelster, Joshua, Medarov, Boris, Sanchez, Juan, Benninghoff, Michael, Barrett, Matthew, Douglas, Ivor, Mansoori, Jason, Rackley, Craig, MacIntyre, Neil, Bermudez, Christian, Schweickert, William, King, Christopher, Desai, Mehul, Rovella, Jennifer, Pechulis, Rita, Keith Scott, L., Muthiah, Muthiah P., Agerstrand, Cara, Abrams, Darryl, Serra, Alexis, Narasimham, Mangala, Gottesman, Eric, Levy, Mitchell, Hussain, Sabiha, Jagpal, Sugeet, Tamae-Kakazu, Maximiliano, Fitch, Stephen, Criner, Gerald J., Desai, Parag, Faugno, Anthony, Morrissey, Brian M., Albertson, Timothy E., Rackauskas, Mindaugas, Doerschug, Kevin, Sethi, Jigme, Enfield, Kyle, Kadl, Alexandra, Akkanti, Bindu, Dinh, Kha, Saberi, Asif, Mehta, Ashish, Seethala, Raghu, Blum, James, Williams, Mark, Buch, Ketan, Pham, Si, Walter, James, Tillis, William, Balk, Robert, Jamkhana, Zafar, Kaul, Pratibha, Hite, Duncan, Abu-Hijleh, Muhanned, Siddiqui, Faisal, Dill, Tracey, Kinoshita, Yuki, Lund, Laura
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Thoracic Society 01.03.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:It is unclear whether extracorporeal CO removal (ECCO R) can reduce the rate of intubation or the total time on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in adults experiencing an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). To determine whether ECCO R increases the number of ventilator-free days within the first 5 days postrandomization (VFD-5) in exacerbation of COPD in patients who are either failing noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or who are failing to wean from IMV. This randomized clinical trial was conducted in 41 U.S. institutions (2018-2022) (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03255057). Subjects were randomized to receive either standard care with venovenous ECCO R (NIV stratum:  = 26; IMV stratum:  = 32) or standard care alone (NIV stratum:  = 22; IMV stratum:  = 33). The trial was stopped early because of slow enrollment and enrolled 113 subjects of the planned sample size of 180. There was no significant difference in the median VFD-5 between the arms controlled by strata (  = 0.36). In the NIV stratum, the median VFD-5 for both arms was 5 days (median shift = 0.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0-0.0). In the IMV stratum, the median VFD-5 in the standard care and ECCO R arms were 0.25 and 2 days, respectively; median shift = 0.00 (95% confidence interval: 0.00-1.25). In the NIV stratum, all-cause in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the ECCO R arm (22% vs. 0%,  = 0.02) with no difference in the IMV stratum (17% vs. 15%,  = 0.73). In subjects with exacerbation of COPD, the use of ECCO R compared with standard care did not improve VFD-5. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03255057).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1073-449X
1535-4970
1535-4970
DOI:10.1164/rccm.202311-2060OC