Therapeutic optimization of atrioventricular delay in cardiosurgical ICU patients by noninvasive cardiac output measurements versus pulse contour analysis

Optimizing atrioventricular (AV) delay improves cardiac output and postoperative outcome. Impedance cardiography (ICG) is a non-invasive method for CO measurement. This study evaluates the ability of two ICG methods to determine the optimal AV delay (OAVD) and to compare ICG with invasive PICCO meas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon Vol. 56; no. 5; p. 269
Main Authors Mellert, F, Lindner, P, Schiller, W, Gersing, E, Heinze, I, Kreuz, J, Welz, A, Preusse, C J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany 01.08.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Optimizing atrioventricular (AV) delay improves cardiac output and postoperative outcome. Impedance cardiography (ICG) is a non-invasive method for CO measurement. This study evaluates the ability of two ICG methods to determine the optimal AV delay (OAVD) and to compare ICG with invasive PICCO measurements. In 14 cardiosurgical ICU patients (age 70.4 +/- 12.0 yrs) with temporary pacing wires, OAVD was determined by pulse contour analysis (PICCO) and ICG (conventional ICG [CI] and electrical velocimetry [EV] ICG monitors). Cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) were measured during DDD pacing with AVD varying from 70 to 270 ms in 20-ms increments. Measured OAV showed a linear correlation between PICCO and ICG: CI (r = 0.82, P < 0.0002) and EV (r = 0.84, P < 0.0002). The mean OAVD deviation between PICCO and ICG was 15.7 +/- 21.0 ms (CI) and 17.1 +/- 20.5 ms (EV). Hemodynamic parameters (SV increase OAVD against worst case) improved significantly (+ 11.7 +/- 7.2 %, P < 0.0001). Inappropriate selection of AVD can compromise the hemodynamic situation of cardiosurgical patients. As it is totally noninvasive, ICG is a reliable and effective tool for tailoring AVD. Both systems (CI and EV) offer valid OAV determination.
ISSN:0171-6425
DOI:10.1055/s-2008-1038515