Liberalism and Conservatism, for a Change! Rethinking the Association Between Political Orientation and Relation to Societal Change

• Published in: Political psychology Vol. 40; no. 4; pp. 877 - 903
• Main Authors: Proch, Jutta, Elad-Strenger, Julia, Kessler, Thomas
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Wiley Periodicals, Inc 01.08.2019; Blackwell Publishing Ltd
• Subjects: Attitudes; Changes; Conservatism; Lay people; Liberalism; Political attitudes; Political ideologies; political orientation; Resistance; resistance to change; Social change; Sociopolitical factors; Wisdom
• ISSN: 0162-895X; 1467-9221
• DOI: 10.1111/pops.12559

According to common wisdom, which is supported by extant psychological theorizing, a core feature of political conservatism (vs. liberalism) is the resistance to (vs. acceptance of) societal change. We propose that an empirical examination of the actual difference in political liberals' and conservatives' attitudes toward change across different sociopolitical issues may call into question this assumed association between political orientation and relation to change. We examined this proposition in four studies conducted in Germany. In Stud 1, we assessed lay people's intuitions about liberals'and conservatives' attitudes toward change. Results of this study concur with theoretical assumptions that liberals accept and conservatives resist change. In Study 2a, Study 2b, and Study 3, self-identified liberals and conservatives were asked whether they would resist or accept change on various sociopolitical issues. Results of these studies suggest that both conservatives and liberals resist and accept societal changes, depending on the extent to which they approve or disapprove of the status quo on a given sociopolitical issue. Overall, ourfindingsprovide no evidence for a one-directional association between political orientation and the tendency to accept or resist change. These findings therefore challenge theoretical and lay assumptions regarding general, context-independent psychological differences underlying political ideologies.