Multiple comparisons of the efficacy and safety for six treatments in Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

• Published in: Foot and ankle surgery Vol. 27; no. 5; pp. 468 - 479
• Main Authors: Shi, Fangling, Wu, Shiyuan, Cai, Wei, Zhao, Youming
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2021
• Subjects: AATR; Acute Achilles Tendon rupture; Complications; Network meta-analysis; Rehabilitation; SUCRA; Treatment; AATR; Network meta-analysis; Treatment; Complications; SUCRA; Rehabilitation; Acute Achilles Tendon rupture
• ISSN: 1268-7731; 1460-9584
• DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2020.07.004

•Minimally Invasive Repair can repair the ruptured Achilles tendon and narrow the tendon gap with low risk of complications and good prognosis.•Accelerated Functional Rehabilitation is superior to Traditional Standard Rehabilitation without increasing the risk of re-rupture under strict rehabilitation management.•Minimally Invasive Repair & Accelerated Functional Rehabilitation is the best therapeutic regime for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture and more RCTs focused on AATR are needed. The choice of the best therapeutic regimen for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture (AATR) remains controversial. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of therapeutic regimens in AATR patients using a network meta-analysis of data from clinical randomized controlled trials. The studies were abstracted from Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. RCTs meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata software, version 14.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA). 38 randomized controlled trials involving 2480 participants were included. The studies were published between 1981 and 2019. A total of 6 therapeutic regimens –open repair (OR), minimally invasive repair (MIR) and nonoperative treatment (non) combined with traditional standard rehabilitation (TSR) and accelerated functional rehabilitation (AFR) - were included in the literature. The treatments were ranked based on the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) probability. In terms of the re-rupture rate, the therapeutic regimens were ranked as follows: OR&AFR, OR&TSR, MIR&AFR, MIR&TSR, nonoperative treatment &AFR and nonoperative treatment &TSR. In terms of the wound-related complication, the therapeutic regimens were ranked as follows: MIR&AFR, nonoperative treatment &AFR, MIR&TSR, nonoperative treatment &TSR, OR&AFR and OR&TSR. In terms of the sural nerve injury, the therapeutic regimens were ranked as follows: non, OR and MIR. In terms of the deep venous thrombosis, the therapeutic regimens were ranked as follows: MIR&AFR, OR&AFR, nonoperative treatment &AFR, OR&TSR, MIR&TSR and nonoperative treatment &TSR. In terms of the returning back to sport, the therapeutic regimens were ranked as follows: MIR&TSR, OR&AFR, OR&TSR, nonoperative treatment &AFR, nonoperative treatment &TSR and MIR&AFR. MIR can repair the ruptured Achilles tendon and narrow the tendon gap with low risk of complications. AFR is superior to TSR without increasing the risk of rerupture. MIR&AFR is the best therapeutic regime for AATR. More RCTs focused on AATR are needed to further indicate this conclusion.