Comparison of functionally-graded structures under multiple loading angles

This paper provides a comparative study on the crashworthiness of different functionally-graded thin-wall tubes under multiple loading angles, which include hollow uniform thickness (H-UT), hollow functionally graded thickness (H-FGT), foam-filled uniform thickness (F-UT) and foam-filled functionall...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThin-walled structures Vol. 94; pp. 334 - 347
Main Authors Li, Guangyao, Zhang, Zheshuo, Sun, Guangyong, Huang, Xiaodong, Li, Qing
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper provides a comparative study on the crashworthiness of different functionally-graded thin-wall tubes under multiple loading angles, which include hollow uniform thickness (H-UT), hollow functionally graded thickness (H-FGT), foam-filled uniform thickness (F-UT) and foam-filled functionally graded thickness (F-FGT) configurations. First, finite element analyses of these differently graded circular tubes reveal that the F-FGT tube has the best crashworthiness under multiple loading angles. Second, parametric study on the F-FGT tube indicates that the thickness gradient and variation range significantly influence its crashworthiness. Third, the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) is used to optimize the F-FGT tube, in which the optimal thickness variation is sought for maximizing specific energy absorption (SEA) and minimizing initial peak force (IPF) under multiple loading angles. The optimized F-FGT tube exhibits better crashworthiness than other three equivalent tube configurations, indicating that the F-FGT tube can be a potential energy absorber when oblique impact loading is inevitable. •Crashworthiness of thin-walled structures with functionally graded wall thickness under multiple load cases.•Multiobjective optimization for multiple load cases.•Design of functionally-graded wall thickness for energy absorber subject to oblique loads.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0263-8231
1879-3223
DOI:10.1016/j.tws.2015.04.030