University student attitudes to prosocial bystander behaviours

• Published in: Health education (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England) Vol. 119; no. 5/6; pp. 408 - 424
• Main Authors: Hennelly, Sarah E, Hussain, Sofia, Hale, Tristan, Cadle, Martha, Brooke, Joanne, Davies, Emma
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bradford Emerald Publishing Limited 13.11.2019; Emerald Group Publishing Limited
• Subjects: Aggression; Attitudes; Barriers; Bullying; Bystanders; College campuses; College Students; Colleges & universities; Community education; Consent; Crime; Disclosure; Education; Foreign Countries; Gender identity; Hate crimes; Homophobia; Human rights; Intervention; Perpetrators; Polls & surveys; Program Effectiveness; Prosocial behavior; Rape; Response bias; Sex crimes; Sexual Abuse; Sexual Harassment; Social Bias; Student Attitudes; Student Experience; Student Surveys; Transgender persons; Universities; University students; Victims; Victims of Crime; Violence; Women; Xenophobia; United Kingdom; United Kingdom > UK; United States > US; Attitudes; Sexual behaviour; Education; Racism; Social interventions; Universities
• ISSN: 0965-4283; 1758-714X
• DOI: 10.1108/HE-05-2019-0023

Purpose Half of British university students experience assault and harassment behaviours; few report them. Bystander intervention training has been recommended as a means of reducing these behaviours, but there is little evidence about their potential effectiveness in UK contexts. The purpose of this paper is to understand UK students’ attitudes towards reporting and intervening in sexual assault, harassment and hate crimes. Design/methodology/approach A mixed methods cross-sectional survey (n=201; 75.6 per cent women) was conducted in one British university. Open text data were analysed using thematic analysis. Findings Students considered harassment and assault unacceptable, and were confident to intervene in and likely to report incidents. However, fear of backlash was a barrier to intervening and reporting, and they felt that victims should decide whether to report incidents. Students perceived perpetrators as being ignorant about what constitutes consent, harassment and assault. They identified a need for university community education about this and how to report incidents and support peers. Research limitations/implications This cross-sectional survey was conducted at one UK University. The data might not reflect other students’ attitudes, and may be subject to response bias. University community bystander training should be acceptable, report and support systems might be utilised by students. This may have potential to reduce prevalence and increase reporting. Practical implications University community bystander training should be acceptable, report and support systems might be utilised by students. This may have potential to reduce prevalence and increase reporting. Originality/value This is the first study to investigate UK student attitudes to prosocial bystander behaviours.