Comparing In-Class and Out-of-Class Computer-Based Tests to Traditional Paper-and-Pencil Tests in Introductory Psychology Courses

This article describes three experiments comparing paper-and-pencil tests (PPTs) to computer-based tests (CBTs) in terms of test method preferences and student performance. In Experiment 1, students took tests using three methods: PPT in class, CBT in class, and CBT at the time and place of their ch...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTeaching of Psychology Vol. 38; no. 4; pp. 282 - 287
Main Author Frein, Scott T.
Format Book Review Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.10.2011
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
College Students
Comparative Analysis
Computer Assisted Testing
Experiments
Introductory Courses
Psychology
Scores
Student Attitudes
Students
Test methods
Test Results
Testing
Tests
paper-and-pencil testing
computer-based testing
test mode effect
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:This article describes three experiments comparing paper-and-pencil tests (PPTs) to computer-based tests (CBTs) in terms of test method preferences and student performance. In Experiment 1, students took tests using three methods: PPT in class, CBT in class, and CBT at the time and place of their choosing. Results indicate that test method did not affect performance and students liked the idea of additional CBTs. In Experiment 2, students chose the test time and administration method for four exams. CBT was the preferred method and CBT performance did not differ from a PPT comparison group. In Experiment 3, students chose the test method, but not the time, for three exams. PPT was the preferred method. Possible explanations for these findings are discussed.
ISSN:0098-6283
1532-8023
DOI:10.1177/0098628311421331