The efficacy of Lactobacillus acidophilus and rhamnosus in the reduction of bacterial load of Helicobacter pylori and modification of gut microbiota—a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomized trial

Background Probiotics may alter the gut microbiota and may reduce antibiotic‐related dysbiosis after H. pylori eradication. However, whether probiotics are effective in reducing the bacterial load of H. pylori and modifying the gut microbiota remains unknown. We aimed to assess the efficacy of Lacto...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHelicobacter (Cambridge, Mass.) Vol. 26; no. 6; pp. e12857 - n/a
Main Authors Chen, Mei‐Jyh, Chen, Chieh‐Chang, Huang, Yu‐Chun, Tseng, Chieh‐Chih, Hsu, Jing‐Ting, Lin, Yi‐Fen, Fang, Yu‐Jen, Wu, Ming‐Shiang, Liou, Jyh‐Ming
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.12.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Probiotics may alter the gut microbiota and may reduce antibiotic‐related dysbiosis after H. pylori eradication. However, whether probiotics are effective in reducing the bacterial load of H. pylori and modifying the gut microbiota remains unknown. We aimed to assess the efficacy of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus rhamnosus in reducing the bacterial load of H. pylori and modifying the gut microbiota. Materials and methods In this double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial, we recruited 40 adult subjects with moderate to high bacterial loads of H. pylori, defined as a mean delta over baseline (DOB) value of the 13C‐urea breath test (13C‐UBT) of 10 or greater every 4 days 6 times. Eligible subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either probiotics containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus rhamnosus or placebo twice daily for 4 weeks. 13C‐UBT was measured weekly from the beginning of treatment to 2 weeks after treatment. Amplification of the V3 and V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA was performed for fecal microbiota. Results A total of 40 subjects were randomized to receive probiotics or placebo. The DOB value was significantly lower in the probiotic group than in the placebo group after 4 weeks of treatment (26.0 vs. 18.5, p = .045). The DOB value was significantly reduced compared to that at baseline in the probiotic group (18.5 vs. 26.7, p = .001) but not in the placebo group (26.0 vs. 25.0, p = .648). However, the eradication rate for H. pylori was 0% in both groups. There was no significant difference in the DOB values between the two groups 1 and 2 weeks after discontinuation of the probiotics. There were also no significant changes observed in the α‐diversity and β‐diversity at week 4 compared to baseline in the probiotic group (p = .77 and 0.91) and the placebo group (p = .26 and 0.67). Conclusions Although the use of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus rhamnosus may reduce the bacterial load of H. pylori, there were no significant changes in the composition of gut microbiota. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02725138.
Bibliography:Funding information
The study was funded by the National Taiwan University Hospital (Grant Number: (Grant Number: NTUH 109‐S4703; NTUH 110‐S5106), the Ministry of Science and Technology, Executive Yuan, ROC, Taiwan (Grant Number: MOST 108‐2314‐B‐002‐209; MOST 109‐2314‐B‐002‐096), the Ministry of Health and Welfare (Grand Number: MOHW 109‐TDU‐B‐211‐114002; MOHW110‐TDU‐B‐211‐124002), the “Center of Precision Medicine” of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (Grant Number: NTU‐109L901401), the Liver Disease Prevention & Treatment Research Foundation, and the Taiwan Sugar Corporation. Except for that the Taiwan Sugar Corporation participated in the study design of this study, the other funding source had no role in study design, data collection, analysis or interpretation, report writing, or the decision to submit this paper for publication
Ming‐Shiang Wu and Jyh‐Ming Liou contributed equally to this work.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1083-4389
1523-5378
1523-5378
DOI:10.1111/hel.12857