Delayed surgical resection of primary left‐sided obstructing colon cancer is associated with improved short‐ and long‐term outcomes
Background and Objectives It is unclear what time interval is optimal between presentation and surgical resection of left‐sided obstructive colon cancer (LSOCC). This study aims to determine whether a time interval beyond 4 weeks is associated with a better outcome. Materials and Methods Consecutive...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of surgical oncology Vol. 124; no. 7; pp. 1146 - 1153 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.12.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background and Objectives
It is unclear what time interval is optimal between presentation and surgical resection of left‐sided obstructive colon cancer (LSOCC). This study aims to determine whether a time interval beyond 4 weeks is associated with a better outcome.
Materials and Methods
Consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection of LSOCC between January 2010 and December 2019 were collected from a prospective database. Patients were divided into three groups: (1) Emergency resection (ER group), (2) surgery in less than 4 weeks (early group), and (3) surgery beyond 4 weeks (late group).
Results
The ER group consisted of 74 (44.0%), the early group of 38 (22.6%), and the late group of 56 (33.3%) patients. Ninety‐day mortality was lower in the Late group than in the ER group and the early group (1.8% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.029 vs. 15.3%, p = 0.011). In the late group 5‐year recurrence‐free survival was better than in the early group (82.1% vs. 63.2%, p = 0.039) and 5‐year overall survival (OS) was better than in the ER group (75% vs. 51.4%, p = 0.021). Definitive surgical resection beyond 4 weeks was an independent prognostic factor for OS (Hazard ratio: 0.402, 95% CI: 0.204–0.793, p = 0.009).
Conclusion
In this study surgical resection beyond 4 weeks after presentation seems to have a better short‐ and long‐term outcome for LSOCC. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0022-4790 1096-9098 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jso.26632 |