Genomic screening of head and neck cancer and its implications for therapy planning
Despite great technical improvements in radiotherapy and surgery, survival for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has still not improved significantly over the last decades. Management of SCCHN has mainly been based on the TNM staging and site over this time period, e...
Saved in:
Published in | European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology Vol. 263; no. 4; pp. 297 - 304 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin
Springer
01.04.2006
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Despite great technical improvements in radiotherapy and surgery, survival for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has still not improved significantly over the last decades. Management of SCCHN has mainly been based on the TNM staging and site over this time period, even though we know that there are individual differences independent of the TNM status. Individual patients with small tumors might have a poor outcome, and patients with large tumors may end up with a favorable prognosis, despite their respective TNM classification. Recent molecular studies indicate that underlying genetic abnormalities may reflect such individual differences independently of TNM status. Individualization of treatment based on such biological properties of the tumors might result in less over as well as under treatment. However, the optimal panel of biomarkers to be used for the individualization of treatment is yet to be defined. A variety of laboratory techniques have been used in studies that investigate the individual biological features, spanning from methods that screen the genome for chromosomal and genetic abnormalities, e.g., cytogenetics, CGH, SKY and cDNA micro array, to detailed studies of specific aberrations. The purpose of this review of the literature is to summarize what has been studied so far by methods for genetic screening and to relate these results to the prediction of the clinical outcome. We conclude that it is time to focus future prospective studies on how treatment can be individualized based on biomarkers in combination with the macroscopic features of SCCHN. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 0937-4477 1434-4726 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00405-006-1039-1 |