Estimation of the parameters of token-buckets in multi-hop environments

Bandwidth verification in shaping scenarios receives much attention of both operators and clients because of its impact on Quality of Service (QoS). As a result, measuring shapers’ parameters, namely the Committed Information Rate (CIR), Peak Information Rate (PIR) and Maximum Burst Size (MBS), is a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inComputer networks (Amsterdam, Netherlands : 1999) Vol. 138; pp. 177 - 191
Main Authors Ramos, Javier, Muelas, David, López de Vergara, Jorge E., Aracil, Javier
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 19.06.2018
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Bandwidth verification in shaping scenarios receives much attention of both operators and clients because of its impact on Quality of Service (QoS). As a result, measuring shapers’ parameters, namely the Committed Information Rate (CIR), Peak Information Rate (PIR) and Maximum Burst Size (MBS), is a relevant issue when it comes to assess QoS. In this paper, we present a novel algorithm, TBCheck, which serves to accurately measure such parameters with minimal intrusiveness. These measurements are the cornerstone for the validation of Service Level Agreements (SLA) with multiple shaping elements along an end-to-end path. As a further outcome of this measurement method, we define a formal taxonomy of multi-hop shaping scenarios. A thorough performance evaluation covering the latter taxonomy shows the advantages of TBCheck compared to other tools in the state of the art, yielding more accurate results even in the presence of cross-traffic. Additionally, our findings show that MBS estimation is unfeasible when the link load is high, regardless the measurement technique, because the token-bucket will always be empty. Consequently, we propose an estimation policy which maximizes the accuracy by measuring CIR during busy hours and PIR and MBS during off-peak hours.
ISSN:1389-1286
1872-7069
DOI:10.1016/j.comnet.2018.04.003