Comparison of range-based volatility estimators against integrated volatility in European emerging markets

•Finding a consistent and asymptotically unbiased estimator of integrated volatility for emerging markets under consideration.•Determining optimal slow frequency for two time scale estimation.•Employing the upper tail dependence (Gumbel copula) measure for comparison purposes, in addition to standar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFinance research letters Vol. 28; pp. 118 - 124
Main Authors Arnerić, Josip, Matković, Mario, Sorić, Petar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.03.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Finding a consistent and asymptotically unbiased estimator of integrated volatility for emerging markets under consideration.•Determining optimal slow frequency for two time scale estimation.•Employing the upper tail dependence (Gumbel copula) measure for comparison purposes, in addition to standard loss functions MSE and QLIKE.•Employing DM test in determining forecasting accuracy between competing OHLC estimators.•Recommending the appropriate ex-post daily volatility measure in the lack of high-frequency data for each emerging market under consideration. This paper explores the effectiveness of eight range-based volatility estimators for seven European emerging markets. It offers added value by: (i) finding a consistent and asymptotically unbiased estimator of integrated volatility for emerging markets, (ii) employing the upper tail dependence for comparison purposes, in addition to standard loss functions, and (iii) recommending the appropriate ex-post volatility measure in the lack of high-frequency data. When no strong preference for a specific estimator is found, the upper tail dependence measure is consulted, confirming the MSE-based ranking for Czech Republic, Greece, Poland, and Romania; and the QLIKE-based ranking for Bulgaria, Croatia, and Hungary.
ISSN:1544-6123
1544-6131
DOI:10.1016/j.frl.2018.04.013