Price of a Finger

Traumatic loss of an index finger is offered twice the amount of compensation as compared to a loss of little finger. However, the little finger plays a pivotal role in power grip thus is underestimated in its importance. Our aim was to test our hypothesis that loss of the little finger will result...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of Hand Surgery Asian-Pacific Volume Vol. 26; no. 2; pp. 305 - 307
Main Authors Van Carlen, Martin, Ghini, Francesca, Mallina, Ravi, Jose, Rajive
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Singapore World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte., Ltd 01.06.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Traumatic loss of an index finger is offered twice the amount of compensation as compared to a loss of little finger. However, the little finger plays a pivotal role in power grip thus is underestimated in its importance. Our aim was to test our hypothesis that loss of the little finger will result in greater or equal loss of grip strength compared to loss of the index finger. Grip strength in the power grip position was measured in 12 healthy volunteers using a JAMAR hand dynamometer. Grip strength of their dominant hand was recorded as a mean kg force of three attempts in three grip configurations 1) using all fingers 2) excluding the index finger and 3) excluding the little finger. Grip strength percentage compared to the full hand was calculated and statistical significance was investigated with a two-tailed T-test. Participants' age varied from 19-64 years, with 4 males and 8 females. Mean full hand grip strength was 28.3 kg force; grip strength with index finger excluded was 65.8% and with little finger excluded was 66.2%. There was no significant difference in grip strength percentage when comparing index or little finger exclusion ( = 0.92). We did not find a difference in power grip using a simulated model of index or little finger loss in a healthy volunteer cohort. This should be taken into account in traumatic loss and work compensation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2424-8355
2424-8363
1793-6535
DOI:10.1142/S2424835521200034