Coverage-dependent errors in the coulometric assay of adsorbed reactants : carbon monoxide on rhodium(100)

Values of the coverage of carbon monoxide irreversibly adsorbed on Rh(100) in aqueous 0.1M HClO sub 4 as deduced by anodic voltammetry, theta exp v sub co , are compared with corresponding values, theta exp s sub co , determined by means of infrared spectrophotometry. The latter values were extracte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the Electrochemical Society Vol. 139; no. 1; pp. 147 - 152
Main Authors SI-CHUNG CHANG, YEUNGHAM HO, WEAVER, M. J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Pennington, NJ Electrochemical Society 1992
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Values of the coverage of carbon monoxide irreversibly adsorbed on Rh(100) in aqueous 0.1M HClO sub 4 as deduced by anodic voltammetry, theta exp v sub co , are compared with corresponding values, theta exp s sub co , determined by means of infrared spectrophotometry. The latter values were extracted from the absorbance of the 2343 cm exp --1 CO sub 2 band obtained from electrooxidation of the adsorbed CO in a thin-layer spectroelectrochemical cell. Unlike the voltammetric method, the spectrophotometric assay of theta sub co is free from complications associated coupled faradaic and nonfaradaic processes. Comparison between corresponding theta exp v sub co and theta exp s sub co values obtained simultaneously by means of coupled voltammetric-infrared measurements reveals the presence of substantial coverage-dependent systematic errors in the former. For adlayers formed at various coverages by direct dosing for various times ( < = 10 min) from dilute ( approx 2 x 10 exp --5 M ) CO solutions, the difference ( theta exp v sub co -- theta exp s sub co ) was found to be nearly invariant with coverage for theta exp s sub co = > 0.1. At saturation coverage, theta exp s sub co = 0.77 ( plus/minus 0.05), whereas theta exp v sub co approx = 1.2. Comparable errors in the voltammetrically deduced coverage were also observed in 0.1M H sub 2 SO sub 4 and in 0.1M KPF sub 6 + 5mM HF. The primary cause of these substantial coverage-dependent errors in the coulometric assay of theta sub co was traced to the presence of additional (probably faradaic) charge arising from the onset of surface oxidation. The background process is coupled to the occurrence of CO electrooxidation, since the presence of even low CO coverages inhibit surface oxidation. Additional errors in theta exp v sub co arising from nonfaradaic charges coupled to CO removal are also considered. The more general implications of these findings to the coulometric assay of adsorbates on reactive transition-metal surfaces are pointed out.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0013-4651
1945-7111
DOI:10.1149/1.2069160