Comparative biomechanical testing of customized three-dimensional printing acetabular-wing plates for complex acetabular fractures
Three-dimensional (3D) printing of an acetabular wing-plate is a new minimally invasive surgical technique for complex acetabular fractures. To investigate the biomechanical stability of 3D printing acetabular wing-plates. The results were compared with 2 conventional fixation systems. Eighteen fres...
Saved in:
Published in | Advances in clinical and experimental medicine : official organ Wroclaw Medical University Vol. 29; no. 4; pp. 459 - 468 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Poland
01.04.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Three-dimensional (3D) printing of an acetabular wing-plate is a new minimally invasive surgical technique for complex acetabular fractures.
To investigate the biomechanical stability of 3D printing acetabular wing-plates. The results were compared with 2 conventional fixation systems.
Eighteen fresh frozen cadaveric pelvises with both column fractures were randomly divided to 3 groups: A - iliosciatic plates fixation system; B - 3D printing plates; C - 2 parallel reconstruction plates fixation system. These constructions were loaded onto a biomechanical testing machine. Longitudinal displacement and stiffness values of the constructs were measured to estimate their stability.
When the load force reached 700 N, Group A was superior to Group B in the longitudinal displacement of point 1 (p > 0.05). The longitudinal displacement of point 2 showed no significant differences among Groups A, B and C, and the displacement of the fracture line over point 3 showed no significant differences between Groups A and B (p > 0.05). The axial stiffness of Groups A, B and C were 122.4800 ±8.8480 N/mm, 168.4830 ±14.8091 N/mm and 83.1300 ±3.8091 N/mm, respectively. Group B was significantly stiffer than A and C (p < 0.05). Loads at failure of internal fixation were 1378.83 ±34.383 N, 1516.83 ±30.896 N and 1351.00 ±26.046 N for Groups A, B and C, respectively. Group B was significantly superior to Groups A and C (p > 0.05).
Customized 3D printing acetabular-wing plates provide stability for acetabular fractures compared to intraspecific buttressing fixation. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1899-5276 |
DOI: | 10.17219/acem/116749 |