Defining Physical Literacy for Application in Australia: A Modified Delphi Method

Purpose: The development of a physical literacy definition and standards framework suitable for implementation in Australia. Method: Modified Delphi methodology. Results: Consensus was established on four defining statements: Core--Physical literacy is lifelong holistic learning acquired and applied...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of teaching in physical education Vol. 38; no. 2; pp. 105 - 118
Main Authors Keegan, Richard J, Barnett, Lisa M, Dudley, Dean A, Telford, Richard D, Lubans, David R, Bryant, Anna S, Roberts, William M, Morgan, Philip J, Schranz, Natasha K, Weissensteiner, Juanita R, Vella, Stewart A, Salmon, Jo, Ziviani, Jenny, Okely, Anthony D, Wainwright, Nalda, Evans, John R
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Human Kinetics, Inc 01.04.2019
Subjects
Aspiration
Cognitive Ability
Definitions
Foreign Countries
Health Behavior
Health Promotion
Holistic Approach
Individual Development
Interpersonal Competence
Lifelong Learning
Motion
Physical Activities
Psychological Patterns
Australia
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

More Information
Summary:Purpose: The development of a physical literacy definition and standards framework suitable for implementation in Australia. Method: Modified Delphi methodology. Results: Consensus was established on four defining statements: Core--Physical literacy is lifelong holistic learning acquired and applied in movement and physical activity contexts; Composition--Physical literacy reflects ongoing changes integrating physical, psychological, cognitive, and social capabilities; Importance--Physical literacy is vital in helping us lead healthy and fulfilling lives through movement and physical activity; and Aspiration--A physically literate person is able to draw on his/her integrated physical, psychological, cognitive, and social capacities to support health promoting and fulfilling movement and physical activity, relative to the situation and context, throughout the lifespan. The standards framework addressed four learning domains (physical, psychological, cognitive, and social), spanning five learning configurations/levels. Conclusion: The development of a bespoke program for a new context has important implications for both existing and future programs.
ISSN:0273-5024
DOI:10.1123/jtpe.2018-0264