Manifesting Destiny: Re/presentations of Indigenous Peoples in K-12 U.S. History Standards
In this mixed-methods study, we use a postcolonial framework to investigate how state standards represent Indigenous histories and cultures. The research questions that guided this study include: (a) What is the frequency of Indigenous content (histories, cultures, current issues) covered in state-l...
Saved in:
Published in | Theory and research in social education Vol. 43; no. 1; pp. 68 - 101 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Routledge
02.01.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In this mixed-methods study, we use a postcolonial framework to investigate how state standards represent Indigenous histories and cultures. The research questions that guided this study include: (a) What is the frequency of Indigenous content (histories, cultures, current issues) covered in state-level U.S. history standards for K-12? (b) What is the difference between the frequency of inclusion of pre-1900 Indigenous content and post-1900 Indigenous content in U.S. history standards for K-12? (c) How do the standards depict Indigenous Peoples in U.S. history? U.S. history curriculum standards from all 50 states and the District of Columbia were analyzed using within-case analysis and quantified to represent each state's depiction of Indigenous content. Findings reveal that standards overwhelmingly present Indigenous Peoples in a pre-1900 context and relegate the importance and presence of Indigenous Peoples to the distant past. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0093-3104 2163-1654 |
DOI: | 10.1080/00933104.2014.999849 |