Manifesting Destiny: Re/presentations of Indigenous Peoples in K-12 U.S. History Standards

In this mixed-methods study, we use a postcolonial framework to investigate how state standards represent Indigenous histories and cultures. The research questions that guided this study include: (a) What is the frequency of Indigenous content (histories, cultures, current issues) covered in state-l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTheory and research in social education Vol. 43; no. 1; pp. 68 - 101
Main Authors Shear, Sarah B., Knowles, Ryan T., Soden, Gregory J., Castro, Antonio J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Routledge 02.01.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this mixed-methods study, we use a postcolonial framework to investigate how state standards represent Indigenous histories and cultures. The research questions that guided this study include: (a) What is the frequency of Indigenous content (histories, cultures, current issues) covered in state-level U.S. history standards for K-12? (b) What is the difference between the frequency of inclusion of pre-1900 Indigenous content and post-1900 Indigenous content in U.S. history standards for K-12? (c) How do the standards depict Indigenous Peoples in U.S. history? U.S. history curriculum standards from all 50 states and the District of Columbia were analyzed using within-case analysis and quantified to represent each state's depiction of Indigenous content. Findings reveal that standards overwhelmingly present Indigenous Peoples in a pre-1900 context and relegate the importance and presence of Indigenous Peoples to the distant past.
ISSN:0093-3104
2163-1654
DOI:10.1080/00933104.2014.999849