Inter-comparison of hemispherical conical reflectance factors (HCRF) measured with four fibre-based spectrometers

• Published in: Optics express Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 605 - 617
• Main Authors: Anderson, K, Rossini, M, Pacheco-Labrador, J, Balzarolo, M, Mac Arthur, A, Fava, F, Julitta, T, Vescovo, L
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 14.01.2013
• Subjects: Agriculture; Algorithms; Chlorophyll - chemistry; Environmental Monitoring - instrumentation; Environmental Monitoring - methods; Equipment Design; Models, Statistical; Plant Physiological Phenomena; Plants; Reproducibility of Results; Spectrophotometry - methods; Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods; Time Factors
• ISSN: 1094-4087; 1094-4087
• DOI: 10.1364/OE.21.000605

We describe the results of an experiment designed to compare the radiometric performance of four different spectroradiometers in ideal field conditions. A carefully designed experiment where instruments were simultaneously triggered was used to measure the Hemispherical Conical Reflectance Factors (HCRF) of four targets of varying reflectance. The experiment was in two parts. Stage 1 covered a 2 hour period finishing at solar noon, where 50 measurements of the targets were collected in sequence. Stage 2 comprised 10 rapid sequential measurements over each target. We applied a method for normalising full width half maximum (FWHM) differences between the instruments, which was a source of variability in the raw data. The work allowed us to determine data reproducibility, and we found that lower-cost instruments (Ocean Optics and PP Systems) produced data of similar radiometric quality to those manufactured by Analytical Spectral Devices (ASD -here we used the ASD FieldSpec Pro) in the spectral range 400-850 nm, which is the most significant region for research communities interested in measuring vegetation dynamics. Over the longer time-series there were changes in HCRF caused by the structural and spectral characteristics of some targets.