Skin sensitivity evaluation: What could impact the assessment results?

• Published in: Journal of cosmetic dermatology Vol. 19; no. 5; pp. 1231 - 1238
• Main Authors: Ye, CongXiu, Chen, Jian, Yang, SuLian, Yi, JinLing, Chen, HaiYan, Li, MeiRong, Yin, SongChao, Lai, Wei, Zheng, Yue
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01.05.2020
• Subjects: Adult; assessment; Dermatitis, Contact - diagnosis; Dermatitis, Contact - physiopathology; Face; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; lactic acid stinging test; Middle Aged; Seasons; Sebum - metabolism; sensitive skin; Skin - chemistry; Skin - metabolism; Skin - physiopathology; skin index; Skin Physiological Phenomena; Skin Tests - methods; Water Loss, Insensible; Young Adult; skin index; assessment; lactic acid stinging test; sensitive skin
• ISSN: 1473-2130; 1473-2165
• DOI: 10.1111/jocd.13128

Background For the evaluation results of skin sensitivity, such as clinical parameters, stinging test records and biophysical assessments dates might be impacted by many factors, the influence factors need to be further explored, and the skin sensitivity evaluation process and methodology needed distinction and normalization. In this study, we investigated the changes of sensitive skin indexes and lactic acid stinging test results in different seasons, facial regions, skin photo‐type, and living habits. Methods Twenty‐four healthy subjects had completed this study. Lactic acid stinging test was performed in different seasons. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin hydration, sebum secretion, and pH were measured in an environment‐controlled room. Correlations between stinging responses, skin biophysical parameters, and sensitive skin inducements in different seasons were statistically analyzed. Results Skin TEWL, hydration, sebum secretion, and pH values on different facial parts were various. Two‐way correlation analysis between the results of lactic acid stinging test in different seasons and the sensitivity factors showed differences between summer, autumn, and winter. The mean scores of lactic acid stinging test increased in autumn. Linear regression analysis of skin sensitivity factors in type III and type IV photobiology skin found that the frequency of sleeping time and eating spicy food in the past of week could infect the sensitive skin evaluation dates statistically (P < .05). Discussion/Conclusions Skin sensitivity assessment results were impacted by seasonal transformation, living habits and customs, and facial regions. These indicted that we should consider above interfering factors when evaluated the skin sensitivity for getting more precise dates.