A generic two-stage fuzzy inference system for dynamic prioritization of customers

•An approach to prioritizing the customers is proposed.•The approach includes a two–stage fuzzy inference system.•Four criteria and arrival time is used for prioritization.•The results show fair prioritization with lower waiting times. This paper presents a fuzzy expert system for prioritization of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inExpert systems with applications Vol. 131; pp. 240 - 253
Main Authors MahmoumGonbadi, Azar, Katebi, Yalda, Doniavi, Ali
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2019
Elsevier BV
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•An approach to prioritizing the customers is proposed.•The approach includes a two–stage fuzzy inference system.•Four criteria and arrival time is used for prioritization.•The results show fair prioritization with lower waiting times. This paper presents a fuzzy expert system for prioritization of heterogeneous customers with different needs. In this way, it is possible to improve the average waiting cost of a queuing system and enhance customer satisfaction as the basic component of organizations. Each customer has his own specific characteristics and demands and expects the system to understand his value and provide the best service. In this study, a two-stage Mamdani fuzzy inference system (FIS) was applied as a decision-making approach to prioritize customers based on Service Duration, Service Value, Customer Loyalty, Maximum Toleration, and Waiting Time. For this purpose, an expert system was developed that can be applied in various fields perfectly. To evaluate and analyze the performance of Fuzzy Prioritization System (FPS), the proposed model is compared with the First-In-First-Out (FIFO) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods as common approaches for prioritizing customers. The results of numerical experiments revealed the efficiency of the proposed system compared to these two methods.
ISSN:0957-4174
1873-6793
DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.04.059